Who else thinks aids is a good thing?

No really it may be the only thing that helps cut down on overpopulation.And most people who get it are either gay'have immoral sex and use drugs.I am aware that some people who have it were either born with it or were raped but most people who have it got it from what I have said before.It's just what saves us from starvation and poverty when you think about it.Less people more food and homes.And plus I dont really think the medicine industry is looking for a cure.Think about it.Medicine is a bisness and people who have aids depend on certain types of expensive medicins to have them treated.If they found a cure then that would mean less money for the industry.Im a right?

And please dont say "What if your son had aids".

Like Scrooge said "Let them die and so decrease the surplus population".
A mean, uncaring thing to say but sometimes that's what I think the purpose of the Vietnam Conflict served to do also.

***** you are treated right

Sterilization is also a good method of solving overpopulation. Just imagine! It could have been you. Maybe you should contract aids or another form of disease to support your theory? Actually, I wouldn't even wish that on you! However, I would definitely consider my first option.

I dont look at it that way.......and you shouldnt either. No one deserves to die from AIDS, even if they made idiotic decisions that caused them to get aids in the first place. Even if they are poor or staving, they still deserve to live.

A GOOD thing? No. A deterrent, a "wake up call", a consequence...yes.

i hate to say it but i think you have a point, may be thats why its so rampant in africa, theyr not even treating them,

I couldn't even read all of that because.....I mean you left me speechless.I can't believe you feel that way.Think about that a little bit harder.You know some of you adults are plain crazy.This is something that you keep to yourself.

It's interesting that you asked this.

There is a conspiracy theory out there that claims the government invented AIDS in the late 60's-early 70's (I believe) and they did this to "eradicate undesirable races", mainly blacks in Africa. It has yet to be disproven.

I think you might be wrong about the medicine industry though. If you can keep someone with AIDS on drugs for their entire life, and you can keep them alive for a long time, then that's money in the bank for you.

STERILIZE MELISSA SHALLENBERGER


before she fills the world with little crackheads.

I don't believe that any disease is truly a good thing. Unfortunately, I'm not a fan of gays so I say unfortunately, you don't have to be gay or raped to have aids.

Blood transfusions, body fluid contamination, heterosexual sex with someone who has aids are all culprits right of the top of my head.

I'm sure though that you made somebody out there that is dying of it feel even worse so you goal was accomplished; you made the world a little bit worse.

I don't know where you get your facts from but MOST people who are getting it aren't having "immoral" (who's morals are you judging them by, theirs or yours?) sex.

The reason why the pharmaceuticals aren't putting forth a massive effort at a cure is that it is not as profitable for them. The largest proportions od those suffering are low or no income. The pharmaceuticals would rather make billions selling "cures" to people who are willing to spend big $$$ on it.

So, NO anything that kills is not a good thing.

What if your son had aids".
lol

I would be so ashamed of my ignorance and inhumanity to ask a stupid question like that. Grow up.RAMO.

When you get AIDS, let's say from a blood transfusion or something, we'll have this conversation again.. What the heck.. when you get sick, don't go to the doctor, your demise will be just one (but an important reduction) to the severe problem of overpopulation in this world today.