We go to the moon but still we are unable to a cure of HIV and AIDS?

The problem is that big pharmaceutical companies make alot more money inventing medicine that "helps" aids patients rather then cures them. If they cure them then they will be out of business. If an aids patient lives with aids for 20 years...thats alot of money the pharmaceutical companies make each year on that 1 patient. 1 Patient will spend over half a million dollars in medicine in his lifetime living with aids. If they cured that 1 patient, how much would the cure cost? at the most maybe $1000????? At the least maybe a $20 shot. The same companies who would have the capabilities of inventing a cure, are the same ones who continue to profit more as long as there is no cure. Theres a doctor in Nigeria who has cured 5 people (out of like 1,000 or so patients he tested it on) but this research hasnt been proven. Theres a link below.

FYI, we went to the moon before HIV and AIDS.

Think of this - what is more profitable for a pharmaceutical company to do?

1. Cure the problem
2. TREAT the problem.

When a problem is treated, the patient must come back, day after day, year after year. There is no residual profit in curing someone for good. Plus, there is more money in growing hair for bald men, while keeping them erect.

Cheers.

Youre onto something. We spent more money and more science on HIV/AIDS than we spent going to the moon. Moreover that should tell you something isnt right about the prevailing orthodox science behind it all. Question what we've been told.