Woulr U rather discover the cure for cancer OR the cure for AIDS and why?

for cancer cause that's the number one killer

cancer because my mother has it

both........

For cancer, people can be born with a gene in their DNA that causes cancer, but no one is born with a gene that has AIDS in it because that would mean their parent had it, but not for cancer, alot more people have cancer in the USA than AIDS, AIDS is more of a problem in Africa, not really anywhere else..

Cancer

I would choose both but if I had to choose I would say AIDS because cancer has survivors while AIDS doesn't. Hopefully we can find a cure for both for future generations.

Cancer because it's preventable (in most cases AIDS preventable, for instance children or if someone is raped.) Or both.......

I vote for discovering a cure from Cancer. That way it helps both because most AIDS patients die of cancer.

if its either , or . cancer , because AIDS ain't for me don't play that way

the cure for cancer, there are many different types of cancer...not that AIDS doesn't need a cure, but it is ony one virus

Both really but Cancer has been around longer so I will go with that one

I think cancer. I choose that: because once you have the cure for the most complex disease we will soon have a cure for aids.

Aids... can you imagine, africa needs help

Cancer.
Definitely get the Noble Peace prize for it.

The cure for AIDS ...there is simply a much, much bigger stigma for AIDS victims than for cancer victims. Even though both diseases are deadly and we should fight to cure them both, the social stigma that AIDS carries makes it even more urgent in my opinion.

cancer

i would choose cancer because i have lost 2 grandfathers to it, and also the best person i have ever known