1. Why do young white men want to act black?
2. Why does islam feel the need to conquer the world when they cant even run thier own country?
3. With the crime rate in the U.S. Why doesnt the gov. ban the sale of handguns to the population?
4. Why can we have all black colleges but not all white or asian etc.?
5. With aids as bad as it is why do so many people still not care about having unprotected sex?
6. Why are so many people hurting little children?
7. Why can black people cut me down racially but it is wrong for me to do it to them?(Not that i would want too that is)
8. How come african americans cry discrimination but Asians, Native americans, islamics, and other cultures dont?
9. Why dont we ban countries who make illegal drugs?
10. Why is the gov. giving finacial aide to other countries when we need the money here so badly for health care and such?
These are only a few but if anyone has the answers please speak up. I am not trying to offend and i am sorry i do. Let's start by stating that nobody, anywhere "gets" to be
a racist (nor should they ever even 'want' to be a racist)
and 'racism' should not be seen as some sort of privilige
that any group of people should "get" (or even 'want').
In addition, the complaint regarding the existence of
the so-called "black" colleges, etc. -- only serves to
show clear lack of familiarity regarding the history
behind them all -- as well as the fact that -- for both
decades and many generations -- most colleges
(and 'funds') were open to 'White' participants "only".
Those are examples of merely but a few of the
"Open to White Only" types of situations (involved in
the 'institutional' or 'systemic' racism) which has existed,
historically, in the United States (and has only "ceased" to
exist -- at least 'on paper' -- just a mere few decades ago).
Not only have the so-called "black" schools *never* once
banned or even considered banning any non-"black"
students -- but in addition -- many of these schools
actually now also have a larger non-"black" student
population than they do a "black" student population.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
The reason that the so-called 'historically-"black" colleges'
(as well as the 'historically-"amerindian" colleges', etc.)
even came into existence in the first place -- was simply
because due to the racism espoused by many White
racial-supremacists -- prior to the 'Civil Rights Act'
of 1964 -- the only schools in the United States that
guaranteed that they would not discriminate against
any qualified "black" students were these schools
which came to be known as the 'historically
"black" colleges and universities'.
The United States also does have and has always
had it's very own "historically White" schools as
well -- as, up until 1964, the White American
majority was allowed to legally discriminate
against any non-White student (and many
White students as well -- ex. many Jewish
students) that they preferred -- which is why the
historically-Amerindian; historically-"black"; etc.
colleges were essential if the qualified non-White
people wanted to have any opportunity for education.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
---------------------------ALSO -------------------------------
In regards to the matter of how / when to refer
to people by the term of 'African-American',
please take note of the following fact.
The 'African-American' (AA) 'Ethnic' group is *not* the
same group as the Black American' (BA) 'Race' group --
that the two (2) terms are *not* synonymous and that the
two (2) terms should *not* be used inter-changeably.
We are *not* speaking of 鈥榮emantics鈥?here 鈥?but rather
鈥?the BAs & AAs are two different groups of people.
The AAs are the (largely Mixed-Race) ETHNIC group.
The BAs are the (Mono-Raced) RACE group.
As confusing as it seems -- the U.S. government
[due to racism & wanting to stigmatize the part
of their lineage that was from Africa which, by
the way, is only one part of their lineage] ---
has labeled those individuals who are the known
"descendents of the survivors" of the system of
chattel-slavery found in the USA as being AAs
(the hyphen is used in reference to acknowledging
the fact that most of them are Mixed-Race,
with African & non-African blood lines)
AND
has labeled those people who are "volitional immigrants"
who are directly from places such as the continent of
African, the West Indies, etc. -- as being BAs
(with the word 'Black' used in reference to acknowledging
the fact that they are of a Mono-racial full-Black lineage).
In addition, it should also be remembered that 鈥?although
some AAs adhere to a socio-political 鈥榠dentity鈥?that is
often described by the slang term of 鈥渂lack鈥濃€攖he AAs
are actually *not* a "Race" group at all -- but rather
they *are* a largely Mixed-Race 'Ethnic' group
(and the socio-political 鈥榠dentity鈥?that a person chooses
*does not* change their racially-mixed ancestral lineage).
Most (+70%) of the people born to two (2) parents who
are of the AA 鈥楨thnic鈥?group are are of a Multi-Racially
鈥楳ixed鈥?(MGM) lineage 鈥?while the people to two (2)
parents who are of the BA 鈥楻acial鈥?group 鈥?on the
other hand 鈥?are of a Mono-Racially 鈥楤lack鈥?lineage.
There is a big difference between a largely Multi-racial
'Ethnic' group and between a Mono-racial 'Race group.
In addition, there is also a big difference between
one's socio-political 'identity' (ex. "black") and
one's ancestral racial 'lineage' (ex. 'Mixed').
Just because a person adheres to a given
socio-political 'identity' does *not* change
the composition of their ancestral 'lineage'.
Also -- the 'One-Drop' Rule (the false teaching that
'any amount' of Black ancestral lineage make a
person "full black") is nothing more than pure-racism.
The racist 'One-Drop Rule' (used only by the United States
government, by the way) was created during the antebellum,
chattel-slavery era by White racial supremacist in order to
get people to believe the false racist myth that the so-called
White "race" was "pure" and to falsely view the Black
"racial" admixture (even the slightest amount) within
someone's ancestral lineage as being "tainted".
To embrace the 'One-Drop Rule' is the equivalent of BOTH
embracing "racism" and embracing the false teaching
that a Mixed-Race person's Black lineage is "tainted".
My advice is that a non-Racist should *not* embrace
the concept of the 'One-Drop Rule' -- as "Black blood"
is *not* "tainted" -- and should never be perceived
or embraced as being so (not even in the
name of so-called "pride" and "unity").
In addition, legally-speaking, attempted forcible
application of the racist 'One-Drop Rule' -- against
any individual or group -- was made illegal and ruled
as unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court
in 1967 via the case of 'Loving vs. The State of Virginia'.
Through the 'Loving vs. Virginia' case, the U.S.
Supreme Court, ruled against both all of the laws
banning Interracial marriage -- and -- also ruled
that any so-called law which forcibly applied the
'One Drop Rule' -- was racist, discriminatory,
illegal, unconstitutional, and non-enforcible.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
Related Links:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MGM-Mixed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FGM-Mixed
------------------------PLEASE NOTE---------------------
--- Dr. Luigi Caveli-Sforza, who is the Executive
Director of the Human Genome Project and the
world's foremost authority on human genetics
has both tested and proven that more that 70%
of all AAs have a full ancestral lineage which
consists of +20-30% White / European and
more than +25% Amerindian bloodlines.
--- That means that the 'average' (+70%) person
born to two (2) parents who are both members
of the AA Ethnic group actually has slightly
less than 50% Black / African blood lineage
found in his or her full-ancestral lineage.
For more information -- see supporting links listed below:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation...
--------------------------- ADDED NOTE ---------------------
It should also be noted that -- contrary to popular belief and
myth spread among many groups who are not educated or
informed on the whole topic -- it was not the group that is
currently being referred to as being the African-Americans
(AAs) -- who chose this term for them -- but rather --
like so many of the other terms used to describe
them -- this term was also implemented by
the United States federal government
(starting with the 1990 United
States 'Census Bureau' Forms).
If a person insists on spreading the 'myth' that it was the
AAs who chose this term for themselves -- it is clearly
indicative of the fact that they have never even once
actually studied the entire topic and are simply basing
their comments on assumption-based ignorance --
rather than objective facts and empirical evidence.
Hope this information is helpful.
. one answer to all of your questions....
I have no idea. Well, for someone who isn't trying to offend, you've done remarkably well.
Can you please ask something about the Irish, so I don't feel left out? Too many questions - though all interesting ones - and i see where you are going - and i agree totally. You don`t really need answers - we know them - don`t we...?
Wink wink. Blacks and forginers can treat us like rubbish because we did in the past. So they can now and whites can't say a word about it, ever see a white face on racist help poster? You ask a lot of questions here but most are behavioral problems. The answer to one simple question could solve them all. Why doesn't everyone live by the ten commandments? Sad we can't do that! I'm just going to answer the ones I can
3- Because the criminals would still get guns. We need better gun control enforcement and punishments, not an outright ban.
5- Because now that there are meds to control it, you don't have as much attention being drawn to protection.
6- We are a sexually repressed society. I bet Amsterdam doesn't have the child molestation rates we do.
9- Well then we have to ban ourselves too
10- In order to maintain trade we have to throw money into other countries. Its hard to understand unless you have a firm grasp on politics. Although I feel the same way.
I don't know about the others 1. It's an enigma
2. Most don't know any different and are evil to the core
3. NRA rules
4. Because we're becoming the minority
5. They're idiots that get caught up in the moment
6. I don't know but they better not get near mine, I'm psycho mom
7. They are the victim in their eyes
8. Same as 7
9. Because we can't support ourselves as a nation, IE oil, etc
10. I wish I knew. Why do people adopt out of the country when there is so many that need them in their own backyard. 1. fuc*ing u talking bout have never act black stop generlizng how do u act a colur???
2. dont give a damn
3. pass
4. who really cares.... i dont
5.................
6. beacuse they like to feel dominant sick ppl
7. ignore racist ppl so difficult isnt it
8................
9. all drugs are illegal..u dont need to do drugs if u dont want 1. Why do young black men want to act black? | 