Why Can't Conservatives Connect The Dominos?

Conservatives are virtually unanimous in their hatred for "nanny state welfare programs", which in unpatronizing and realistic verbage, means, "programs intended to help those in society who either can't realistically help themselves (kids), or
those who started the race of life about 10 laps down to most middleclass suburban windbags (those raised in decaying urban squalor, profoundly backwards and undereducated appalachian shantytowns, etc).

To ELIMINATE those programs, would...

#1- excaserbate the poverty, which would...

#2- increase the theft, salving drug use, and criminality in
general, which then...

#3- increases local taxes needed for law enforcement, and
state taxes needed for the newly imprisoned, OR...

#4- creates NON-welfare programs that need cut, in order to
offset the increase in law enforcement spending, which...

#5- put greater strain on the military budget, thus...

#6- AIDING TERRORISM.

Think, people, think.

Because poverty doesn't necessitate crime. Hahaha... They don't get it at all.

Senator McCain has connected the dots by not voting for Bush's spending plans. Obama supported million of dollars in earmarked bills for special interests and corporations which McCain did not support.

Seems like Obama needs to connect the dots since he support Bush's bills when McCain did not.

Wherever did you get the idea conservatives oppose welfare? We oppose the *abuse* of welfare, not aid to the truly needy.

All of your points are non-sequiturs:

1) If the undeserving are booted from welfare, then they'll need to find a job. That doesn't exacerbate poverty.

2) The overwhelming number of those in "poverty" DO NOT engage in crime. Are you stereotyping??

3, 4 & 5: All mistaken due to your first two faulty assumptions.

Sincerely try to eliminate abuse and we can work together to improve the economy. Continue to look the other way while honest taxpayers are being ripped off, and we'll be at odds.

Cordially,
Slam

Going from cutting welfa