What Does It Say About Obama Supporters When They Deny He Lied Even Though His Campaign Admitted He Lied ?

Concerning his vote on the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act when he was in the Illinois State Senate.. The bill that would stop doctors from throwing live babies in garbage cans and utility closets to die, or just leaving them on the table to die without providing assistance .

Obama claimed that the Federal "neutrality clause" wasn't in the Illinois bill and that if it were he would have voted for the bill instead of against it. Investigative reporter Jill Stanek proved that the exact same clause Obama said wasn't in the bill was actually placed in the bill by the very committee Obama chaired. Yet he still voted against it.

Then Obama calls us all liars -----

Since the August 13 report, Obama was a guest with CBN's David Brody File where he told the world that anyone who doubts his word on his Illinois BAIP vote is a "liar."

Here in part is what Obama told David Brody in Saturday's August 16 interview:

"Well and because they have not been telling the truth. And I hate to say that people are lying, but here's a situation where folks are lying."

However --- The Truth finally comes out . ** The same day the interview aired, the Obama campaign did a 180 on the issue admitting that Obama did vote against the very bill with the very language in it that Obama has claimed for 6 years did not exist.
His campaign yesterday acknowledged that he had voted against an identical bill in the state Senate,

So in the end, Obama does support leaving live babies to die . His votes tell us that , the record proves that, and now even his campaign admits that . . . . . .yet some of you still deny it???

I realize that this info won't magically change a democrat into a republican, and that was never my intent . I like the fact that we have people with diverse and opposing views . But folks, it's one thing to be a democrat and yet another thing to vote for a man who supports leaving live babies to die without aid, and then has the audacity to think you're so stupid as to believe his lie of 6 yrs despite his campaign admission.

As Drew Bloodsd's answer proves;
Obama supporters are just plain ignorant!

All politicians lie. Like McCain saying he is not sure how many houses he owns; or McCain saying he isn't very good at the economy, but all our problems are psychological, not financial.

LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU! LA LA LA LA LA LA LA GO OBAMA! LA LA LA LA LA LA OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT! LA LA LA LA LA LA LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA! GO OBAMA! LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA!

All politicians are liars. You're a fool if you believe otherwise.

In reporting on abortion-rights opponents鈥?criticism of Sen. Barack Obama's opposition as an Illinois state senator to bills seeking to amend the Illinois Abortion Law of 1975, the media have promoted numerous myths and falsehoods about Obama and the legislation. In several instances, the media have simply repeated false accusations -- or made the accusations themselves -- that Obama's opposition amounted to support for infanticide. In fact, Obama and other opponents said the bill posed a threat to abortion rights and was unnecessary because, they said, Illinois law already prohibited the conduct supposedly addressed by the bill.

On the August 18 edition of his radio show, Rush Limbaugh claimed that Obama "believes it is proper to kill a baby that has survived an abortion," while right-wing pundit Ann Coulter said that Obama "wants the doctors ... chasing it through the delivery room to make sure it gets killed." Further, author Jerome Corsi claimed that "[e]ven if a child was born, he said the woman still had the right to kill the child in an abortion," and Oregonian associate editor David Reinhard wrote that Obama's opposition was "enabling infanticide." In fact, Obama and other opponents said the bill posed a threat to abortion rights and was unnecessary because, they said, Illinois law already prohibited the conduct supposedly addressed by the bill.

It's been said that, if it weren't for lack of context, there would be no news.

You have to consider the source.

One source of these claims is Jerome Corsi, who has also written that McCain made his wealth through the Mafia and that 9/11 was perpetrated by the Bush Administration.

Another source of these claims is Jill Stanek, who says domestic violence is acceptable against women who have abortions. She also supports billboards in Tanzania that say "Faithful Condom Users" in English and Swahili, written next to a large skeleton, to discourage condom use. She claims that "aborted fetuses are much sought after delicacies" in China to which she added, "I think this stuff is happening."

Don't extremist conservatives think it might hurt their cause to put out stuff that's so easily debunked? or do they not think their audience would feel its intelligence is being insulted?