Do you think the AIDS virus was accidentally introduced to humans through the Polo vaccination program?

exuse me, i meant Polio......

No.

A substantial volume of published scientific data contradict the OPV (oral polio vaccine) AIDS hypothesis; as a result, the hypothesis is considered unsupported, unlikely, or disproven by the mainstream scientific community.

Journalist Edward Hooper (and his embracing of the OPV HIV theory) was line by line disproven by the same scientists to which he presented his data in the infamous 2000 meeting. At this meeting, three independent labs ran tests on the remaining stocks of Koprowski's vaccine, as demanded by Edward Hooper in The River. The tests confirmed Koprowski's contention that his vaccine was made from monkey, rather than chimpanzee, kidney, and found no evidence of SIV or HIV contamination. Additional epidemiologic and phylogenetic data was presented at the conference which undermined other key aspects of the OPV AIDS hypothesis; according to a report in Science, Hooper "did not challenge the results; he simply dismissed them."

In 2001, three articles published in Nature examined various aspects of the OPV-AIDS hypothesis, as did an article published in Science. In every case, the studies' findings argued strongly against any link between the polio vaccine and AIDS. The evidence cited included the dating of the introduction of HIV-1 to humans as occurring at some point in the early 1930s.

The author of one of the studies, evolutionary biologist Edward Holmes of Oxford University, commented in light of the new evidence: "Hooper's evidence was always flimsy, and now it's untenable. It's time to move on." An accompanying editorial in Nature concluded:

"The new data may not convince the hardened conspiracy theorist who thinks that contamination of OPV by chimpanzee virus was subsequently and deliberately covered up. But those of us who were formerly willing to give some credence to the OPV hypothesis will now consider that the matter has been laid to rest."

The claim that Kisangani chimpanzees were, indirectly, the true source of HIV-1 was again addressed in a 2004 study published in Nature. Here, the authors found that while SIV was present in chimpazees in the area, the strain of SIV infecting these chimpanzees was phylogenetically distinct from all strains of HIV, providing direct evidence that these chimps were NOT the source of HIV in humans.

In short, this claim has been disproven.

Hope this helps.
For more info check out wikipedia (OPV AIDS hpothesis)

Do you mean Polio?

And no.

no it was brought from the north pole when santa was having sex with all the little female elves and then when he brought presents to humans he had sex with this bum girl...ON ACCIDENT...one thing led to another and now its passed all around the country. damn elves

I think the government is behind it.