Can anybody tell me what is the possibility of aids infection with heterosexual intercouse without condo?

guys thanks for your answers, i certainly mean male-female one of which is hiv infected. i have digging net just could find that the possiblity with anal intercourse is %90. but i couldnt find any vaginal intercourse possibility. some say low, some say high but logically thinking if it were %100 probably the worlds half population should have been infected since hiv first appeared at 80s. i dont really think that the possibility is more than %10. i do think that its just making people fear. besides some say condoms dont protect %100. probabaly the possibility of being killed in dark london streets is far more higher than getting hiv after having vaginal intercourse with hiv infected female.

Well, you got one thing right, aids can affect hetro or gay..
a condom will protect, against pregnancy and fluid carrying
deseases... however, if you have an open wound, a slight
paper cut even...and your partner is HIV, bodiley fluids
may be transfered. This is a potential epidemic and must
be stopped.. any doubts, have a test...DO NOT BURY YOUR
HEAD....only you and people with doubts can halt this awful
problem spreading.....PLEASE !!!!

I'd say 100%

I was told by a GUM Clinic that it was very hard to contract AIDS if you are hetrosexual - the high risk groups are Bi sexual people or gays having anal sex !

I can't give you the odds but if you look at it like this you will better understand. Everyone that she was with & everyone they were with & everyone they were with. Same thing on both people. I can go back a long way. Say your with 50 x it 50 they were with x the 50 they were with, that's 250,000 you were just with. See what I'm saying? Wrap that rascal Hope this helps or gives you something to think about.

Are you circumcised or uncircumcised? This is not a joke answer. A recent UN/WHO study in Africa found that the incidence of HIV infection in heterosexual men is 60% lower in circumcised men than uncircumcised men. They have some theory that the foreskin in uncircumcised men is thinner than the rest of the penis and more susceptible to be broken and invite HIV and STD's into the body.

Add that to your statistical analysis of risk of HIV infection for heterosexual men who do not wear condoms.

bloody 100%these days

Well if it's only 10% then what's the fuss. I mean you have a 16% chance of being killed with Russian Roulette and I know we all play that several times a day.
Even a 0.5% chance would be far too high for me to risk it.

A condo? OUCH! I never heard of that....

In nutrition they told us homosexual females are the least likely to get it, heterosexual males are the second least likely to get it. then hetero women and then gay men. Hetero women are at such a higher risk because they can be lied to by a partner who is actually bi-sexual. This seems to be how most hetero women who are not IV. drug users contract the disease.

some of the anwer in here seemed to be lax of protection. I say good luck. Don't jump before you put the parachute on.

are you really that thick HIV kills--- you might as well put a gun to your head,

depending on how many partners you have unprotected sex with & how many partners your current liaison have had unprotected sex with. The number could be stupidly high or remarkably low. Whoes to say though really

Aids is a myth spread by Governments to try and stop people enjoying themselves.

I have never worn a condom in any sexual liaison and have never been asked to, man or woman