Changing Tomorrow Conference Logo
 

Standards – who cares?

Chair: Colin Capner, Bristol seminar participant

Facilitator: Ruth Lowbury, Medical Foundation for AIDS and Sexual Health (MedFASH)

Rapporteurs: Sarah Lang-Jones, UKC and Justine Sswerwadda, PW

This workshop, held twice during the conference and attended by 22 people, was for anyone living with HIV seeking advocacy skills and help in managing their care, in partnership with health professionals.

Interests of those attending

Professional interest

Not working in HIV anymore so would like to update knowledge

Service users – want to know what the standards are and how these can be used when interacting with service providers

Want to influence Scottish standards

Ruth Lowbury gave a presentation about MedFASH’s recommended standards for NHS HIV services. Consultation was wide, including health professionals, voluntary sector agencies and people living with HIV. There were no national standards prior to these.

Why were the standards for HIV needed?

Services are coping with increasing numbers and diversity of clients, particularly outside London :

There is rising HIV incidence and prevalence

1 in 3 infections are undiagnosed

Complex treatment and monitoring is required

There are difficulties of ART and adherence

There are changing and complex user needs

People living with HIV are geographically spread

HIV is still potentially fatal

What other factors have influenced the need to develop standards?

NHS modernisation

Tackling the lottery of care

The desire for innovative care pathways

Wanting a patient-centred NHS

Clinical networks across organisations

National Strategy for Sexual health and HIV

In the future:

Updated national standards for HIV treatment and care services will be developed

All HIV practitioners to work within a managed clinical network

About the recommended standards for NHS HIV services

They were developed by MedFASH

Involved a wide range of stakeholders

Published in October 2003

Endorsed by Department of Health (DH), British HIV Association (BHIVA) and Providers of AIDS Care and Treatment ( PACT )

There are 12 standards for care

There is 1 standard for managed service networks

The formalised structure copied the standard of diabetes

 

What are the guiding principles?

Achievable in all areas of England

Equity of access

Patient centred (in the document patients are referred to as ‘people living with HIV’)

Focus on outcomes

Multidisciplinary and multi-sector

Partnership in care

Delivery through managed service network

Networking works because what you can’t do alone you can do together. This has been learnt from good practice in cancer and heart disease. A network doesn’t necessarily need to be convened by health professionals. The standards have an implication across all disciplines.

What are managed service networks?

Linked groups of services, professionals and organisations convened by commissioners

Span NHS primary, secondary and tertiary care, the voluntary sector, and social care

Work in a coordinated manner unconstrained by existing professional and organisational boundaries in order to ensure the equitable provision of high quality and effective services throughout the network area.

Managed HIV service networks

All people living with HIV should have access to services, which operate within a managed service network, in order to achieve the best possible treatment and care for individuals, as close as possible to where they live.

What are the scopes of the standards?

HIV services for adults (but not for paediatric care)

HIV specialist and non-HIV specialist

They compliment BHIVA guidelines

Prevention

Social Care

Format of each standard

Aim

Standard

Rationale

Key interventions

Implications for service planning

Guidance on practice

Suggested audit indications

Who should use the standards?

Service providers (planning, monitoring, audit, practice guidelines)

Commissioners (service specifications, resource allocation)

HIV service networks (shared protocols, referral pathways, training)

Strategic health authorities (performance management)

People with HIV (managing care in partnership, user advocacy)

Integral to the standards:

Empowerment of people to take control of their health and the management of their HIV

Involvement of people with HIV in the planning and monitoring of services

Participation in the development of local service networks

Standard 3: Empowering people with HIV

All care should take place in a partnership between people with HIV and care providers so that there is joint decision making and support to adopt and maintain a healthy lifestyle

Services should recognise the impact of HIV infection on an individual and the stigma and social exclusion unique to HIV

Standard 6: Social care integrated with healthcare

The NHS, local authorities and partner agencies should set up a multi-agency planning group to develop, implement and evaluate a network of HIV and social care services

This group should ensure full appropriate and adequately resourced involvement in the HIV service network of statutory and voluntary, social and healthcare providers and service users

Questions and discussion

Participants felt that it was a good idea that the development and publication of the document has been done but some were disappointed about the initial service-user consultation and participation. To many present, it was the first time they had seen and heard of the standards. It was suggested in future to run focus groups or workshops to comment on the content before publication.

Is there a body that monitors how these standards are interpreted and delivered?

Ruth explained that this is only at a local level. Healthcare commissioners will be monitoring all services but this will not be in depth. One participant said that he now felt that he could use the document to approach his local patient user group, however higher up involvement would be more difficult.

The comment was made that those Primary Care Trusts and providers who will use these standards effectively are likely to be those who are good anyway. The suggestion was made that organisations producing newsletters could include questions around the standards by including surveys in mailings.

There was a discussion around the networking between specialists and GPs and how service-users can encourage ongoing dialogue. Sometimes when people disclose their status this can highlight the need for training. New GP contracts that will include payment for enhanced services may improve routine screening.

People living with HIV still had problems getting NHS dentists

The publication could act as an important manual for HIV services for people living with HIV.

Indicators were added. These are the methods of monitoring if and to what degree the Standards have been implemented by the individual PCT’s in an area. As the indicators suggested in the report have not yet been tried in practice, there was a suggestion that other indicators might be needed or those already suggested modified in the light of experience.

Campaigning organisations who are lobbying for better standards of care should be added to the list of individuals/organisations who might find the Standards useful as a tool for advancing their aims.

MedFASH would welcome feedback about any aspect of the standards.

KEY POINTS

The standards set out a framework for what services people living with HIV should reasonably expect to be provided by their local health community

They cover standards for all services from prevention and early diagnosis of HIV, through to care post diagnosis and support for individuals (and their carers) who develop related illnesses including progression to AIDS and support towards a dignified death

There are suggestions for monitoring how effective and complete implementation of the standards have been

RECOMMENDATIONS

People living with HIV or caring for someone with HIV should read this report

People living with HIV should review the MedFASH standards against the care they are receiving

People living with HIV, carers and HIV organisations should contact MedFASH if local experiences of healthcare do not meet MedFASH standards

EVALUATION

This workshop was evaluated by 19 people between the ages of 27 and 62 (average age 41).

Gender

8 male, 7 female, 4 not stated

Ethnicity

9 black African, 5 white, 5 not stated

Sexuality

10 heterosexual, 5 not stated, 4 gay

Usefulness

Very useful

Useful

Not useful

53%(10)

47% (9)

0% (0)

NOBODY said not useful

9 people set action points

Use report as campaigning tool

Use to improve services at GP & HIV clinic

Make local health providers aware of MedFASH standards

Review item for use in my healthcare

Be more involved on local level, monitor standards

 

Move on to Pregnancy And Childbirth

Back to top of page

Back to contents